The last step is just to keep track of our version because sometimes we need to fix some bugs to a specific version. When we are live we should follow these steps: The release branch has no more bugs and it’s approved from the testing team. If everything is ok the hotfix branch should be merged on the release branch and after we need to delete the my_bug branch. This usually is created starting from the release branch. This one will be used only if in the previous branch (release) had some issues in the testing and we need to perform a bug fix. A new branch should be created starting this time from the release branch. Now let’s suppose that the testing team found a bug in the release version and we need to fix it. The naming should be like this: release/1.0.1 which 1.0.1 is our version of the application.Īll the possible bug fixes found on the testing should be merged on this branch.
Sourcetree compare two branches code#
This branch will be used when all the teams have merged their code into development and the app is ready for testing. Let’s explain the release branch Release Branch Your project branches should look like this now: Create it and push it to origin as before. In this example, we will call it “feature/example_task”. To create the new branch for the task, follow the same procedure that we’ve done for the Develop branch, but this time as the name you can put “ feature/my_branch_name”. All the new tasks should be created in a folder called “feature” and always starting from the Develop branch. Now let’s suppose that you have a new task to deliver for the next release. We will explain later how we should work/merge on the Develop branch. The Develop is the branch that all the developers will merge their tasks before the release and it’s the latest version (stable) before going live. As we said before, the master is usually the latest version that we have in the store or maybe a live website and it should be updated only when our project will go live. There are two copies of my commit: one in its own branch that's never been merged, and one in the master branch which must be where the pull request was "merged.Now that we created the branches let’s see what’s their purpose.
But I noticed something about the graph that I had missed before. I ran the command " > git log -oneline -abbrev-commit -all -graph" and found the commit I was looking for in the output, and it's the same as SourceTree's graph. I'm not exactly sure what's going on, but this seems to produce unexpected behavior. It seems to just use the commits in the pull request to make new commits on the master branch. When a pull request is "merged" there's no merge commit. Pull requests in GitHub seem to be handled kind of differently. So for two lines to merge together they need to merge at a commit, and this would be the merge commit, conventionally with a description like "Merge branch A into B." In the branching graph, each commit is a node connected by colored lines. In SourceTree, when we merge a branch locally the merge itself has its own commit. I'm not a Git expert so I'm going to need some help piecing this together. Hey, I know this is an old question, but I'm experiencing this problem and I'd like to give some input.
0 kommentar(er)
